Contrast Therapy and understanding it's Impact on Muscle recovery after Trek and intense training

What exactly happens in a Trek to the Body and what we need to maintain the physical and mental resilience?

A long trek leaves more than tired legs. After several hours of walking over uneven terrain, climbing gradients, carrying a backpack and constantly adjusting to changes in the environment, the body has been exposed to a complex physiological challenge. Heart rate rises, energy expenditure increases, muscle fibres experience repeated mechanical loading, glycogen and other energy substrates are progressively utilised, connective tissues absorb repetitive forces, and the balance and proprioceptive systems remain continuously active. At the same time, thermoregulation works to maintain core temperature while the cardiovascular and respiratory systems adjust blood flow and oxygen delivery according to the demands of the working muscles and the surrounding environment. 

A demanding strength-training session creates a different but equally significant challenge, where mechanical tension, metabolic stress and neural demand provide a stimulus that the body must subsequently process. We often describe the period after such activity simply as “recovery,” but recovery is only one part of a much larger biological process. The more interesting question is what the body does with the stress it has experienced, because the ultimate purpose of an appropriately dosed physical challenge is not simply to return the body to its previous state, but to stimulate adaptation.

Tapas: The Discipline of Staying With the Process

The Sanskrit word Tapas comes from the verbal root tap, associated with heat, burning or generating heat. In the Yoga Sutras of Patañjali, Tapas is presented as one of the three components of Kriya Yoga, together with Svadhyaya, or self-study, and Ishvara Pranidhana, often translated as surrender or devotion. Tapas is therefore considerably more nuanced than simply “pushing through discomfort.” It can be understood as disciplined effort, the willingness to engage with an appropriate challenge, remain present through difficulty and cultivate greater capacity through sustained practice. Patañjali later describes Tapas in relation to the body and senses, suggesting a process through which disciplined practice refines and strengthens one's relationship with the body and sensory faculties. This does not mean that suffering itself is inherently beneficial, and this distinction becomes particularly important when we bring Tapas into conversation with modern physiology. Biology does not adapt simply because something is difficult; adaptation occurs when a stimulus is appropriately dosed and followed by the conditions necessary for restoration and biological remodelling.

Stress Is Not the Enemy

Physiological stress is often spoken about as though it were inherently harmful, but the human organism is designed to respond dynamically to changes in its internal and external environment. Every time we exercise, the body temporarily moves away from its resting state: heart rate and ventilation increase, blood flow is redistributed, muscle metabolism accelerates, reactive oxygen species are generated, mechanical forces are transmitted through muscle, tendon and bone, and hormonal and autonomic systems are activated. These changes do not necessarily represent damage; many of them represent information. The body is receiving a signal that the demands placed upon it have changed, and it responds by activating mechanisms that help it meet those demands. This is one of the fundamental principles underlying physical training, where the exercise session provides the stimulus and the period that follows provides the opportunity for the body to restore, remodel and adapt. With appropriate repetition and adequate recovery, the organism can gradually become more capable of dealing with a similar challenge in the future.

Hormesis: When a Stressor Becomes a Signal

This phenomenon is closely related to the concept of hormesis, which describes a biological response in which a relatively low or appropriately controlled exposure to a stressor can stimulate adaptive mechanisms that improve the organism's ability to tolerate subsequent stress. Exercise is one of the best-studied examples of this principle. During physical activity, increased metabolic activity produces transient oxidative and energetic stress, including the generation of reactive oxygen species. Rather than functioning solely as harmful by-products, some of these molecules can act as signalling mediators that activate pathways involved in antioxidant defence, mitochondrial adaptation and cellular stress resistance. 

At the mitochondrial level, this has been discussed through the concept of mitohormesis, where a controlled metabolic perturbation can initiate signalling pathways that ultimately contribute to adaptive changes in cellular and mitochondrial function. The stressor therefore becomes a biological signal rather than simply a source of damage. However, hormesis should never be interpreted as an argument for seeking progressively greater amounts of stress. It is fundamentally a dose-response phenomenon, and a stimulus that is too small may be insufficient to generate a meaningful adaptive response, while an excessive stimulus that is repeated too frequently or followed by inadequate recovery can overwhelm the body's capacity to adapt.

The Trek Is the Stimulus: Physical and Mental

Consider what happens during a long mountain trek. Every step involves the coordinated action of multiple physiological systems: the quadriceps and gluteal muscles repeatedly generate force, the calf complex contributes to propulsion and stabilisation, the intrinsic muscles of the foot continuously adjust to variations in terrain, and the ankle, knee, hip and spinal musculature respond to changes in load and surface. At the same time, the vestibular, visual and proprioceptive systems continuously provide information about position and movement, while the cardiovascular and respiratory systems increase oxygen delivery and energy metabolism adjusts according to intensity, duration, terrain and available substrate. All of this occurs while the body is simultaneously regulating temperature, hydration and blood pressure. 

The trek is therefore not simply a period of walking; it is a multisystem physiological stressor that provides information to the body about the demands it may need to meet again. With progressive exposure and sufficient recovery, repeated trekking can contribute to improvements in cardiovascular capacity, muscular endurance, movement efficiency, coordination and tolerance to physical workload. The same principle applies to resistance training, where mechanical tension produces a cascade of molecular and cellular events that influence protein turnover, mechanosensitive signalling, neuromuscular function and tissue remodelling. The important distinction is that the training session itself is not the adaptation; it is the stimulus that initiates the processes through which adaptation can occur.

Recovery Is Not the Opposite of Training

Recovery should therefore not be considered merely the absence of exercise. It is an active biological phase during which the organism restores energy availability, regulates fluid and electrolyte balance, repairs and remodels tissues, regulates immune and inflammatory processes and gradually restores physiological systems towards their baseline state. Nutrition provides the substrates required for tissue repair and glycogen restoration, hydration supports cardiovascular and thermoregulatory function, and sleep provides an essential physiological environment for restoration and adaptation. In this sense, the body does not simply become stronger during the moment of physical exertion; rather, the training stimulus initiates a series of processes that continue during the hours and days that follow. Recovery is therefore not something separate from training but an integral part of the training process itself.

When Recovery Becomes Another Stressor

This distinction becomes particularly relevant in the current popularity of sauna, ice baths, cold plunges and contrast therapy, which are often described as recovery practices. Physiologically, however, these interventions are not passive. Heat and cold are environmental stressors that deliberately perturb the body's internal state, and their usefulness depends upon context, dose, timing, the individual's physiological condition and the desired outcome. If someone has just completed a six-hour trek in the mountains, for example, the body may already be dealing with elevated cardiovascular demand, accumulated muscular fatigue, increased core temperature and changes in fluid balance. Entering a very hot sauna followed immediately by very cold water does not simply “switch on recovery”; it introduces another series of physiological challenges. Whether that additional stimulus is beneficial depends on what the individual is trying to achieve and whether the body has sufficient capacity to accommodate another stressor.

Sauna: Heat as a Physiological Stress

Heat exposure produces a measurable cardiovascular and thermoregulatory response. As body temperature rises, cutaneous blood flow increases and sweating becomes an important mechanism for heat dissipation, while heart rate increases as the cardiovascular system works to support both thermoregulation and systemic circulation. Repeated heat exposure can produce adaptations associated with thermoregulation and cardiovascular function, and observational and experimental research on sauna bathing has explored potential effects on vascular function, blood pressure and cardiovascular health. Heat exposure also activates cellular stress pathways, including the expression of heat-shock proteins, which contribute to the maintenance of protein integrity and cellular responses to thermal stress. These mechanisms make heat exposure an interesting example of a physiological stressor capable of stimulating adaptive responses. However, heat remains a stressor, and after prolonged exercise, particularly in a hot environment or in the presence of significant fluid loss, additional heat exposure may represent an unnecessary or excessive physiological load for some individuals. The relevant question is therefore not simply how much heat a person can tolerate, but whether the dose of heat is appropriate for the current physiological state and intended outcome.

Cold Water: A Different Kind of Stress

Cold exposure produces a very different physiological response. Sudden immersion in cold water activates the sympathetic nervous system and produces the well-described cold-shock response, which can include rapid involuntary breathing, increased heart rate and blood pressure, and peripheral vasoconstriction. These responses are part of the body's immediate attempt to defend core temperature and reduce heat loss. Cold-water immersion should therefore not be understood simply as a relaxation technique; it is a potent environmental stimulus that produces substantial acute physiological changes. Research suggests that cold-water immersion can improve certain aspects of short-term recovery following strenuous exercise, particularly perceptions of muscle soreness and, in some circumstances, aspects of subsequent performance. However, the evidence is not uniform across all forms of exercise or all recovery outcomes, and the effects depend on the protocol, timing and training context. A recovery intervention that makes an athlete feel less sore, for example, does not necessarily mean that it will optimise every biological process involved in long-term adaptation.

The Timing of the Cold Plunge Matters

This becomes especially relevant following resistance training. The inflammatory, metabolic and anabolic signalling that occurs after resistance exercise is part of the complex biological environment through which skeletal muscle adapts. Immediate cold-water immersion may alter some of these signalling processes, and research examining repeated resistance training has raised the possibility that immediate post-exercise cold-water immersion may modestly attenuate muscle hypertrophy adaptations. Importantly, this does not mean that ice baths are inherently harmful or that they should never be used after strength training. Rather, it highlights the importance of matching a recovery intervention to the physiological objective. If the immediate priority is reducing soreness and restoring readiness for another performance bout, cold exposure may have a useful role; if the primary goal is maximising muscle hypertrophy, routinely using cold-water immersion immediately after every resistance-training session may not be the most appropriate strategy. The distinction is therefore not between “good” and “bad” recovery methods, but between interventions that are appropriate or inappropriate for a particular context.

Contrast Therapy: The Wisdom Is in the Dose

Contrast therapy alternates between heat and cold, creating repeated changes in thermal, cardiovascular and autonomic demand. Moving from heat-induced vasodilation towards cold-induced vasoconstriction produces a dynamic physiological experience, but this should not be interpreted as a competition between extremes. The coldest water is not necessarily the most effective, the hottest sauna is not necessarily the most beneficial, and increasing the number of rounds does not automatically increase the adaptive value of the intervention. The physiological principle remains one of appropriate dosing, because the same sauna exposure that feels restorative after moderate exercise may represent excessive stress after prolonged exertion, dehydration or significant heat exposure. Similarly, the same cold exposure that helps an athlete feel prepared before another competition may not be desirable immediately after every hypertrophy-focused resistance-training session. Contrast therapy is therefore best understood not as an obligatory recovery ritual but as a tool that can be strategically applied according to the individual's state, training goals and tolerance.

Tapas After the Trek

This is where the concept of Tapas becomes particularly relevant. During the trek, Tapas may look like perseverance—the willingness to continue walking when the terrain becomes demanding, to remain attentive to one's movement and to engage consciously with physical effort. During strength training, Tapas may be expressed through the discipline required to progressively challenge the musculoskeletal system while maintaining technical integrity and respecting the boundaries of fatigue. During a challenging yoga practice, it may be the willingness to remain present with sensation without immediately escaping it. After the stimulus, however, Tapas may take on a very different form. It may mean having the discipline not to add another unnecessary stressor, recognising that the body has already received sufficient stimulus and allowing the physiological processes of restoration to take place. It may mean eating adequately, replacing fluids and electrolytes, sleeping, taking a rest day, choosing gentle movement instead of another intense workout, or simply allowing the body to be still. In a culture increasingly focused on optimisation, this ability to recognise when enough is enough may itself be a sophisticated form of discipline.

Resilience Is Not the Ability to Tolerate Everything

Resilience is often described as toughness or the capacity to tolerate increasingly greater amounts of stress, but physiology suggests a more nuanced understanding. A resilient system is not one that remains unaffected by stress; rather, it is a system capable of responding appropriately to perturbation, regulating the response, recovering and adapting. If training loads repeatedly exceed an individual's ability to recover, fatigue can accumulate faster than adaptation, potentially leading to declining performance and impaired wellbeing. Conversely, appropriately dosed training followed by adequate recovery can gradually expand physiological capacity. Resilience therefore emerges not simply from exposure to stress, but from the repeated interaction between challenge and restoration. The goal is not to remain permanently stressed or to eliminate stress altogether, but to develop the capacity to move between activation and recovery with increasing flexibility.

The Nervous System Also Needs Recovery

A trek does not challenge only the muscles; it also places demands on the nervous system. Continuous movement over uncertain terrain requires attention, motor planning, proprioceptive processing, sensory integration and constant adjustment to environmental information. Strength training requires sustained motor output and coordination, while cold exposure produces a rapid autonomic response and heat exposure alters cardiovascular and thermoregulatory demand. Throughout all of these experiences, the nervous system continuously receives information about internal and external conditions and adjusts physiological output accordingly. From a yogic perspective, this makes the concept of interoception particularly interesting. Interoception refers to the perception and interpretation of signals arising from within the body, including breathing, heartbeat, temperature, muscle tension, visceral sensations, fatigue and changes in arousal. A sophisticated recovery practice therefore asks not only what we have done to the body, but what the body is communicating to us in response.

From Endurance to Awareness

Perhaps this is where Tapas begins to intersect with Svadhyaya, or self-study. The deeper practice is not simply learning to tolerate discomfort but learning to discriminate between different kinds of sensation and physiological states. Can I distinguish productive muscular effort from excessive fatigue? Can I recognise the difference between discomfort and pain? Can I notice when my breathing becomes dysregulated, when my attention becomes fragmented or when my nervous system begins to feel overwhelmed? Can I recognise whether the cold plunge is leaving me refreshed or depleted, whether the sauna is restorative or exhausting, and whether I actually require another stimulus at all? Developing this kind of awareness allows the individual to move away from externally imposed rules about what recovery “should” look like and towards a more responsive relationship with the body. In this sense, Tapas is not merely the ability to stay with discomfort; it is the discipline to observe the body's response closely enough to know when to continue, when to modify and when to stop.

The Practice After the Practice

After the trek, there is another journey that is less visible but physiologically significant. The mountain may be behind you, but the body continues to process the experience as energy stores are replenished, fluid balance is restored, muscle and connective tissues undergo repair and remodelling, and the nervous system gradually transitions away from sustained physical demand. Sleep supports many of these restorative processes, while nutrition and hydration provide the substrates and physiological conditions required for recovery. Gentle movement may help maintain circulation without introducing substantial additional training stress, while time allows the various systems involved in the response to settle and reorganise. This period can appear passive because there is nothing dramatic to observe from the outside, but biologically it is an active phase of adaptation. Recovery is where the information contained in the stressor is processed and, when the conditions are appropriate, translated into greater capacity.

Tapas Is Not Suffering

Perhaps this is the most important distinction. Tapas should not become a philosophical justification for pushing the body beyond its capacity, just as hormesis should not become a scientific justification for constantly exposing ourselves to stress. Both concepts become distorted when discomfort itself becomes the objective. The purpose of training is not suffering, the purpose of cold exposure is not suffering, the purpose of heat exposure is not suffering, and the purpose of Tapas is not suffering. The deeper principle is intentional challenge combined with awareness, discipline and transformation. The trek challenges the body, strength training challenges the musculoskeletal system, heat challenges thermoregulation, cold challenges autonomic and cardiovascular regulation, and recovery creates the space in which the organism can respond to these experiences. The practice is therefore cyclical: challenge, observe, recover, adapt and return.

Modern wellness culture can sometimes make resilience appear synonymous with the ability to withstand increasingly extreme conditions, but a more sophisticated understanding of physiology suggests something different. We do not become resilient by avoiding every stressor, nor do we become resilient by seeking the greatest possible stress. We develop resilience by learning how to dose stress intelligently, recover deliberately and listen deeply enough to recognise what the body is asking for. Sometimes Tapas is the courage to continue; sometimes it is the discipline to stop; and sometimes the most sophisticated practice is simply to allow the body the time and space required to recover, reorganise and adapt. That, perhaps, is the deeper practice of Tapas after the trek.

References:

Ji LL, Gomez-Cabrera MC, Vina J. Exercise and hormesis: activation of cellular antioxidant signaling pathway. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1067:425–435.

Radak Z, Powers SK, Khakimova R, et al. Mitohormesis in exercise training. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016.

Radak Z, Chung HY, Koltai E, Taylor AW, Goto S. Exercise, oxidative stress and hormesis. Ageing Res Rev. 2008;7:34–42.

Laukkanen JA, Laukkanen T, Kunutsor SK. Cardiovascular and other health benefits of sauna bathing: a review of the evidence. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93:1111–1121.

Moore E, Fuller JT, Bellenger CR, et al. Effects of cold-water immersion compared with other recovery modalities following acute strenuous exercise: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2023;53:687–705.

Piñero A, Burke R, Augustin F, et al. Effects of post-exercise cold-water immersion on resistance training-induced hypertrophy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Sport Sci. 2024;24:177–189.

Peake JM, Neubauer O, Della Gatta PA, Nosaka K. Muscle damage and inflammation during recovery from exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2017;122:559–570.

Kellmann M, Bertollo M, Bosquet L, et al. Recovery and performance in sport: consensus statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13:240–245.

McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:171–179.

Patañjali. Yoga Sūtras, II.1, II.43 — Tapas, Kriyā Yoga and disciplined practice.